About Me

Name:LASER Haas
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Simple matter of Law and Willful blindness to crimes

The Crimes that are confessed
 
The TBF law firm confessed to supplying the DE Bankr Ct false affidavits in 2001 and 2002.
 
The MNAT law firm confessed to supplying false affidavits in 2001 and 2002.
 
MNAT admitted it did not disclose  the Goldman Sachs connections and the GE connections.
 
TBF admitted it did not disclose that the person MNAT and TBF placed within eToys, secretly as President & CEO was a paid person of the TBF law firm and a partner with TBF's senior owner Paul Traub.
 
Making the crimes more henious, the US Trustee testified in the Motion to Disgorge TBF for $1.6 million that it forewarned the parties not to replaced key executives of the Debtor with anyone connected to the retained professionals.
 
Not only did they disobey the US Trustee, they drafted a clandestine Hiring Letter that rewarded Barry Gold, if he would NOT apply to the Court.
 
 
Disqualification is Mandated by Section 327(a)
 
Any first year bankruptcy petitioner knows that "non-disclosure" of "conflicts of interest" must result in disqualification.
 
Did MNAT and TBF fail to disclose?  The answer is yes!
 
Did they supply errant Rule 2014 and Rule 2016 affidavits?  The answer is Yes!
 
Were they disqualified?  NO!
 
Why not?  The Delaware system of justice says it is no big deal!!!!
 
 
The Delaware Dept of Justice gives TBF implied, blanket, immunity
 
First the Director of the US Trustee replaces the Region 3 Trustee, when the crimes are reported.
 
Then the Asst US Trustee Frank Perch motions to Disgorge the TBF law firm for $1.6 million
 
Then the DOJ trial attorney, Mark Kenney and new US Trustee sign a Stipulation to Settle.
 
The Stipulation provides illegal permission to circumvent the Code 327(a)
 
The Stipulation thus gives implied, blanket, immunity with
 
"WHEREAS, the United States Trustee shall not seek to compel TBF to make additional disclosures"
 
The police of the Federal Bankruptcy Courts, stated in writing, that they will not do their Job!
 
 
TBF, MNAT and Barry Gold committed Collusion to Defraud an Estate 
 
As court approved officers of the Court MNAT represented eToys, TBF the Creditors and they placed Barry Gold in as CEO of eToys.
 
None of them disclosed that Bain, who owned KB Toys was their connected party.
 
Then they sold their eToys clients assets to their other client Bain/KB for discounts in the tens of millions.
 
This is COLLUSION TO DEFRAUD AN ESTATE.
 
The Whereas shall not compel clause is seeking to Cover up this high crime, that is why the DE DOJ will not mention the MNAT name.
 
 
Armed with impunity another $100 million in fraud occurs.
 
The MNAT and TBF law firm, comfortable with their success of their schemes to seize $45 million of estate assets then committs another $100 million fraud.
 
Not yet being "caught" MNAT is brazenly and flagrantly representing Bain in the $100 million cash preferential in the KB bankruptcy case.
 
Then, after the Disgorge Motion was made moot by the DE DOJ, the TBF law firm had the unmitigate gall to petition the Court in the KB case for permission to prosecute the $100 million cash transfer.
 
TBF did not disclose to the eToys or KB case that TBF and Barry Gold worked for Stage Stores Bankruptcy that was owned by Bain affiliated associates including the Stock holder, Director of Stage Stores Michael Glazer that was also CEO of KB Toys.
 
Barry Gold testified that Jack Bush, the Bain/ IdeaForest person gets Barry Gold employments often. Jack Bush was also a director and stock holder at Stage.
 
Stage happened in 2000 and eToys filed in 2001.
 
More than 100 crimes were committed and the DE DOJ keeps ignoring the facts.
 
There is the $100 million cash preferential to Wells Fargo, that both TBF and Barry Gold now admit they work with.
 
Not reviewing such preferential in the case of In re Bucyrus 94-20786 (ED Wisc) landed Gellene of the Milbank Tweed firm in jail, the Milbank firm disgorged their entire $1.9 million and lost litigation for more than $20 million, A book was written Eat What You Kill the Fall of a Wall Street Lawyer
 
There was more than $2 million in overseas cash deposits not reported.
 
There was $2 million in electronics sold two weeks before BK filing.
When we asked for the paperwork, the girl deleted key fields and then quit.
 
The three girls who handled the IT department kept switching serial numbers to benefit certain vendors.
Then quit and went to Aruba together for two weeks
 
The Court approved destruction of books n records and the executives abandoned the estate.
eToys went public in 1999 for $8bn and bankrupt March 2001.
 
The sale to Bain/ KB violates the "bona fide" requisite of the Code.
 
There is a $500 million lawsuit against Goldman Sachs that MNAT let TBF have and TBF supplied another false affidavit to the court to get the job and is using the law firm that helped get Barry Gold his D&O insurance.
 
There are profuse reasons to prosecute, but the DOJ stated, in disbanding the Public Corruption Unit, that it was doing so to make the DOJ more efficient.
 
There where are the case numbers from the ORO on eToys?
 
 
The DOJ helps bury the investigation.
 
There are not just one reason for prosecution, there are hundreds.
Including, but not limited to, Bribery, Perjury, Collusion, Intimidation of Victim/ Witness etc etc.
 
When we found out that the US Attorney, Colm Connolly was a partner with the Law firm that the DE DOJ is refusing to even name, that being the MNAT law firm. We made an Official 18 USC 3057(a) complaint to the CA US Attorney Tom O'Brien.
 
His office did not respond, however, the L A Times reports that he disbanded the Public Corruption Unit and threatened career prosecutors with retaliations if they dared speak ot the Press about why.
 
The FBI finally called us but handed the case to a bankruptcy fraud agent on Mortgage fraud issues.
 
So we also spoke with agenst in Washington DC who handed us over to agenst in Maryland as Md supervises Delaware.
 
Then the Region 3 Trustee resigns, the FBI also raids the OSC"s office and home for destroying whistle blower files against government.
 
Now we are deeply concerned because the person that went back in as Region 3 Trustee is Roberta DeAngelis, the person the Director replaced in 2004 when we first reported the crimes.
 
The Director and Asst US Trustee resigned after we discovered the additional $100 million fraud in April 2005.
 
Now the DOJ is an appellee with MNAT, TBF And Barry Gold peititioning the Court to throw out the appeal.
 
The DOJ specifies in a footnote in their appelle bried that they will NOT address the issues of MNAT!
.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Synopsis of Offenses and cover up

It Begins 
 
eToys went public in 1999 for nearly $8bn and was bankrupt March 2001.

   Like Refco, this classic pump n dump issue should have been thoroughly investigated by the FBI, DOJ, SEC etc.
 
   Instead the Court approved destruction of the books n records as the Executives had many hidden issues and abandoned the estate.
 
   This left the most unusual fresh baked batch of cookies ever seen by attorneys. There it was the cookie jar of estate assets all alone, with no one to protect. So the counsels made a conscious decision to make the bankruptcy entity their very own vault. The only thing they needed to do was supply the Court and parties of interest an affidavit stating they had no undisclosed conflicts of interest. Then they could have their cookies, get some milk and eat until the burbed in full.
 
   They are still continuously engaging in fraud, obstruction of justice and perjury at will, where the MNAT law firm represents Goldman Sachs in Delaware and has become partner of sorts with Barry Gold, the new CEO of eToys who just so happens to be the paid associate of the TBF law firm that is handling the NY Supreme Court case of eToys v Goldman Sachs worth $500 million or more.
 
Officers of the Court must supply an oath "under penalty of perjury" to act in good faith.
 
     The court-approved counsels for eToys, both Debtor and Creditor; have confessed to supplying false affidavits and deceiving the Court in the eToys bankruptcy case. When any professional person is court approved to work in a Federal estate they become “officers of the court”.

            Congress has designed the statutes of the Bankruptcy Code to level the playing field and assure equitable justice to everyone, every entity, large or small. The Code has safeguards that protect debtor and creditors rights equally. Finality transpires by fair treatment of all creditors, shareholders and all other parties of interest, who are forced, by Federal statutes to yield their rights to the Bankruptcy Code. When a bankruptcy occurs, only those of documented prowess who agree to supervision of the Court and affirm an oath of propriety are permitted to engage in working upon a bankruptcy matter. As such the work can be lucrative, but it also comes with the price of compliance to higher ethical standards.

            Upon receiving the cryptic approval of the Bankruptcy Court for destruction of books n records, the Executives abandoned the estate and the attorneys for both Creditor’s and Debtor in eToys collaborated in deceiving the Court by supplying false affidavits.

            The Code is specifically designed to keep the attorney’s hands out of the cookie jar of estate assets. Congress has long been aware that an unchecked bankruptcy system tends to work more for the benefit of wayward counsels than for creditors. There are many statutes to assure propriety. Including the definition of Disinterested Persons §101(14) where the parties have to affirm they are not connected to the case, to the owners of the entity and that they are “arms length” in their transactions with any other court approved functionary. This is to assure that hidden power centers may develop outside of the courts or Congressional authority.

            The Congressional statutes also require that all persons or entities that desire to be engaged as a Professional Person (entity or person) must supply an application of Professional Person per Section 327(a) that states they are disinterested and defines the scope of their duties. There can be no duplication of duties, so that the remaining, distressed assets of the estate are not swallowed up by the expense of the professionals in any arbitrary or duplicitous manner.

            Upon supplying the application, defining ones intended work area, the Code also requires a Rule 2014 affidavit where the party must state, “under penalty of perjury” that they are “arms length” in their transactions to assure good faith dealings. They also affirm they are “disinterested” persons and that they have “disclosed” all relevant issues to the Court so that it can make an informed decision. To put it succinctly an attorney must promise to keep their hands out of the cookie jar and that they are not ganging up to find a way to sneak around the judge’s auspice.

            The Court approved Law firm for the eToys bankruptcy 01-706 (the “Debtor”) (DE Bankr 2001), that being Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel (“MNAT”), along with the Court approved counsel for the Creditors, Traub Bonacquist & Fox (“TBF”) supplied their required affidavits stating that there was no “undisclosed” items and that they had no “conflicts of interest”.

            The Code, in and of itself, is mitigating in nature. An attorney does not have to comply with the “I will not lie” statute. Instead, the counsel complies with the statutes and Rule 2014 Affidavit as a Professional Person (by Section 327(a)) stating they are a Disinterest Person (§ 101(14)). The first premise is that an attorney already knows, by his oath to the BAR, to act in a higher ethical manner and the Code assumes counsels can be self policing, especially when they are mandated to give the additional Rule 2014 Affidavit reminding them of their obligation.
The MNAT and TBF law firms confessed to submitting 34 false affidavits say it is not Perjury!
 
            Both TBF and MNAT lied as “officers of the court”! The confessed that they submitted more than 34 false affidavits and yet the Delaware Dept of Justice and Courts state it is no big deal.
 
   They did so intentionally, because they believed that they had nefariously seized control of the entire bankrupt estate of eToys. To any honorable person or jury, the fact that criminal acts have occurred would not be in dispute, for the parties confessed to supplying false affidavits. It is only in the Delaware corporate dominance realm that anyone would be so arrogant as to infer that lying under oath is no big deal. One has to wonder what Martha Stewart or Barry Bonds would say about such a premise?   
 
             The only real issue, in Haas’s opinion, is whether or not this whole scheme was contrived in the Fa;; of 2000 or Spring of 2001.
The Law firms perpetrated Collusion to defraud the eToys estate!

            The MNAT law firm continues to this day, under the cloak of the Dept of Justice implied, blanket, immunity, to hide the fact that MNAT had an ongoing relationship with Bain associated parties. At the same time the TBF law firm and the new President/ CEO of eToys, Mr. Barry Gold both worked for the Stage Stores S Texas bankruptcy (S TX Bankr 00-35078), where Bain affiliated owners and the CEO of KB Toys was involved. The germane issue of that being that MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold negotiated the sale of their client eToys to their other “undisclosed” client Bain/ KB for tens of millions of discounts. This is collusion to defraud!

            The Collusion framework of the bankruptcy Code is so strict about such issues, it does not matter if you received a million dollars for an item you can argue was worth only merely a penny. The failure to disclose a connection to a buyer of estate assets is Collusion to Defraud an estate. Whether it is a personal debtor refusing to disclose a hidden lottery ticket or attorney’s buying a foreclosed house through secret auction, the crime is still the same. Collusion is “the” most heinous act that the Code and Bankruptcy Fraud statutes seek to assure cannot occur.
Barry Gold accepted a bribe to secretly become President & CEO

            Barry Gold was “planted” within eToys secretly and by bribery. The parties drafted a clandestine Hiring Letter in 2001 and did not reveal the Hiring Letter to the Court until January 25, 2005. Doing so then only in defensive response to the Emergency motions to address the fact that the TBF law firm and Barry Gold had both supplied oaths to the Court that they were not connected. Even the Hiring Letter itself is deceptive. It does not say Barry Gold, the paid party of the TBF law firm is now offered as President and CEO. Instead, every act the parties engaged upon, including the plan confirmation hearings, where the shareholders questioned Barry Gold on the stand in 2002, about possible connections of Mr. Gold to the TBF law firm. Every single instance the parties denied and inferred that they were not connected.

            That is, of course, until Haas provided proof to the contrary. Then the parties’ simply switched gears, stating that they should have but didn’t and they were sorry.
The DOJ will punish bankruptcy fraud for $1000 of persons yet gives TBF immunity for $ millions in fraud.

            If you go to the US Trustee website you will see the US Trustee program engaged in Fraud Task Forces such as Operation Silver Screen or Operation Truth or Consequences. At the Silver Screen report you will see the cases of a person who did not declare a snow mobile, another person had a bad check issue for $6,490.00, etc, etc.

            So this case begs the question, are the systems designed to punish only mom and pop petitioners while the perpetrators of massive fraud that steal a public entity merely get a slap on the wrist fine?
US Trustee testified he warned the parties not to commit the crimes

            Making this case extensively more heinous, believe it or not such is possible, the Asst US Trustee testified in the Motion to Disgorge the TBF law firm for $1.6 million that the parties’ had engaged in discussions with the United States Trustee’s office about replacing key executives of the Debtor with persons the law firms desired to choose. The US Trustee stated, within the Motion to Disgorge, twice, the US Trustee’s concerns about replacing key personnel with parties connected to the retained professionals. They were warned, in advance, not to do so!

            All any honorable person need do is read the US Trustee Motion to Disgorge the TBF law firm for $1.6 million. It only addresses a few of the one hundred crimes no known to have transpired. Yet it stated that the violations were deliberate, rather than inadvertent. That the planting of Barry Gold was not accidental, as it was done by direct request of the TBF law firm and it concluded the Fraud upon the Court had occurred.

            The Disgorge Motion did effort leniency for the well-established colleagues. It stated erroneously, in the first footnote, that Barry Gold did not have to apply. This was a snow job upon Haas and the eToys shareholders for being layman. The Disgorge Motion also failed to seek the mandatory disqualification of the parties for failing to disclose; under the pretense that it was to long ago. Again, another effort to take advantage of the lack of legal knowledge of the parties by the Dept of Justice.

            At the barest of minimums the Dept of Justice personnel were overwhelming demonstrating that they were incompetent and unable to fulfill their duties. However, when you combine those errant legal premises with the fact that the US Trustee is specifically provided as the policing agent of such issues and is deeply instructed on the requisites, statutes by the United States Trustee Manual; as well as their Handbook & Guidelines also contain extensive case precedents to clarify how to monitor professional applications.
The DOJ Attorney gives Illegal immunity to perpetrators of Fraud & Perjury
 
   Less than ten (10) days after the Disgorge Motion was supplied to the Court, Mark Kenney, the Dept of Justice Trial Attorney signed a Stipulation to Settle that gave ILLEGAL, implied, blanket, immunity to the TBF law firm with the following unlawful clause;
 
   "WHEREAS the United States Trustee shall not seek to compel TBF to make additional disclosures"
 
            One can easily see that the Dept of Justice personnel were not telling the truth as well. Especially when the Handbook states with particularity that any person with “any” autonomy in bankruptcy matters must be considered a professional. The very case of Kraft v Aetna was provided to us by the US Trustee websites. In re Kraft v Aetna Casualty & Security Co., 43 B.R. 119 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984) (appraiser cannot bypass 327(a) by stating mechanical services.)
The Delaware Dept of Justice goes out of its way not to mention the MNAT law firms name
 
            When you add in the fact that in the Dept of Justice Disgorge Motion, the Dept of Justice Stipulation to Settle and the recent Third Circuit appellee brief by the Justice Dept where the Dept of Justice is an appellee with MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold; that they all do not state anything about the MNAT failures to disclose and false affidavits violations. Then you have proof positive undeniable that the parties are being granted “above the law” status for the expressed benefit of issues connected to the MNAT law firm.
   The Third Circuit appeal brief by the Dept of Justice even contains a footnote
that the US Trustee will not address the MNAT issues.
 
   The morose issue germane is the fact that the 3rd Circuit appeal is by the eToys shareholders (3rd Cir 07-2360) where the shareholder Robert Alber objected to the fact that the Court approved the illegal Stipulation to Settle that gave unlawful permission for the TBF law firm not to disclose.  When the shareholders appealled the MNAT law firm cross appealled because the Order and Opinion approving the Stipulation to Settle stated that MNAT acts were deliberate.  The DE Dist Ct combined the Alber and MNAT appeals.  So if the US Trustee refuses to address the MNAT issues, in essence, they are letting the issue stand that the MNAT acts were deliberate being contradictory to their own premise and breaching their fiduciary duties.
 
MNAT  is so powerfully connected no one will dare touch them

            The final nail in the coffin of that premise is the recent discovery of the previously undisclosed issue that the Senior Justice of the Circuit Court was a former partner of the MNAT law firm, where the Circuit Court picked the Chief Justice of the Bankruptcy Court and the United States Attorney for Delaware, now nominated to be the District Court Justice was also a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001. When the fraud and perjury began in the eToys saga.

            It is obvious that extensively egregious crimes were committed. It is also clearly evident that they were intentional. Compounding the criminality is the corruption and cronyism of the refusal to prosecute and remedy. The parties that were caught red-handed are being let off with no more than a paltry slap on the wrist. And, if all that severally heinous activity was not enough the Delaware system of justice is punishing the whistle blower for pointing out the felony violations and rewarding the conflicted attorneys with the right to devour the $45 million in cash of the estate and letting the perpetrators control the outcome of the $500 million dollar NY Supreme Court case.

            Need we say anything else?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Short version on the DOJ cover up of $300 million in Fraud

The Delaware Dept of Justice refuses to prosecute, investigate or, for that matter, even name the bad faith acts of the MNAT law firm as if such were a cardinal sin.
 
It is a fact that the MNAT and TBF law firms both confessed to deceiving the Court and submitting, multiple, false, affidavits to the Federal Court as Officers of the Court.
 
TBF received a Motion to Disgorge for $1.6 million and then was provided a Stipulation to Settle that gifted them Illegal, implied, blanket, immunity. 
 
Now the Delaware Dept of Justice is an Appellee with MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold in the 3rd Circuit Court case 07-2360 as the Dept of Justice egregiously petitions the Court, with taxpayer dollars to throw out eToys shareholders, tossing the whistle blower as the DOJ falsely states that the appeal has no merit.
 
The Dept of Justice even states in a footnote that if will not address any MNAT issues, that is simply absurd as MNAT cross appealed the case and the District Court combined the cases.
 
Think these matters do not harm you, they are in Goldman Sachs, Levitz, Finova, Kmart, Enron, Jumbo Sports, Gadzook, Stage Stores, Toys R Us, Sears, JoAnn's, etc etc.,
 
They go from one Public entity to another and then place the entity into bankruptcy with designed controls to devour the entity from all sides. Going from one entity to another, walking it into Bankruptcy violates most State laws, Federal and even SarOx.
 
The entity eToys went public in 1999 for $8bn and bankrupt March 2001.
 
Where did the money go?
 
And what happened to the standard investigations by the SEC, FBI and Dept of Justice.
 
Since then more than $300 million in fraud and thirty four acts of perjury are documented.
 
The law firms of MNAT and TBF, being "caught" with red-handed, confessed that they filed the false affidavits and deceived the court offering cheeky excuses of inadvertent neglect.
 
 The Asst US Trustee, Frank Perch, documented that the acts were deliberate, premeditated and intentionally left to stand as false.
 
Then Perch Motioned to Disgorge the TBF law firm for $1.6 million and testified therein, that he had forewarned the parties not to violate the law.
 
Less than ten (10) days later the Dept of Justice Trial attorney, Mark Kenney, provided illegal, implied, blanket, immunity to the TBF law firm.
 
Speciously, despite the fact that the MNAT law firm also confessed to filing the false affidavits and also admitted to deceiving the court, the Delaware Dept of Justice does not even mention the MNAT law firms name or acts in any briefs.
 
It has since been discovered that the US Attorney in Delaware, Colm F Connolly, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, when the fraud and perjury began.
 
This is a serious ethics and protocol violation that will most likely hold up the nomination of Colm Connolly from becoming a Delaware District Court Federal Justice.
 
The Delaware Dept of Justice is persistently using taxpayer dollars, defending the right to give theillegal, implied, blanket, immunity, acting as an appellee attorney defending MNAT and TBF while asking the courts to strike and expunge Haas and the shareholders, along with striking and expunging all pleadings that document the perjury and fraud.
 
Additional crimes of perjury and fraud continue, such as the $100 million cash fraud issue in the KB case and the $800 million lawsuit in the NY Supreme Ct. Yet the Dept of Justice simply refuses to do anything about the mendacity.
 
The proof is overwhelming and the number of felony violations is over 100, including Bribery, Fraud, Perjury, Intimidation of Victim/ Witness, Failure to disclose an assets, Collusion to Defraud and Estate and quite possibly RICO.
 
Yet not one single investigation is occurring into the 34 acts of  perjury and over $300 million in fraud.
 
WHY?
 
You can look at the post(s) below for the proof of these acts.
 
If a person cares about the integrity of the system of justice, the acts of mendacity of the law firms, being directly competitive with the Dept of Justice overt efforts to obstruct will boggle your mind~
 
Yes, it is "our" case
 
However
 
IT IS EVERYONE"S SYSTEM OF JUSTICE AT STAKE HERE!
 
Upon finding, proof positive, upon the Dept of Justice Office of Legal Policy (USDOJ OLP) website that Colm Connolly, by his own resume, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, we filed an Official Complaint with the CA US Attorney Tom O'Brien.
 
We received no response from O'Brien's office, however, the Los Angeles Times reports that he walked into a regular meeting, belittled his staff for not finding and prosecuting enough cases
 
(HELLO - Mr O'Brien, 100 cases for prosecution all you have to do is look here)
 
Then, O'Brien summarily disbanded the Public Corruption Unit.
 
US Attorney O'Brien also felt it necessary to threaten career prosecutors to keep their mouths shut and not to discuss any reason for the dismantling with the Press.
 
We called Asst US Attorney's, they spoke with the FBI, the FBI called us, the SEC emailed us, we talked to agents east and west coast, the Region 3 US Trustee has resigned and the FBI even raided the OSC"s home and office, seizing his computer/ files for destroying whistle blower cases against Government personnel.
 
One would then think that they case is going to be solved - correct?
 
Then why did the Dept of Justice send in the removed Roberta DeAngelis, as Acting US Trustee, to the very Region 3 Office over Delaware when DeAngelis is one of the parties, as an appellee, defending the Illegal immunity deal?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Law Professors, Senators' and Judges document DOJ bad faith

It is necessary to document the amount of skulduggery that is readily apparent to Congress and the Courts by providing authoritative commentary that is now becoming profuse throughout the land.
 
Any additional information others may have on the subject is welcomed.
 
 
Many distinguished parties are making remarks about the odd ways the Court's, the Dept of Justice are behaving, especially concerning cases in Delaware.
 
The WSJ Law Blog did a piece on the issue of Delaware's Corp dominance issues  ( here )
 
ProPublic.org speaks of issues that seek to protect the Dept of Justice high up personnel being contrary to the new law that was designed to increase the scrutiny and accountability of our governmental entities, except of course, for the dear ole DOJ
 
The Book by UCLA Law Professor Lynn LoPucki on Courting Failure
How Competition for Big Cases is Corrupting our Bankruptcy Courts, is an authority's look at the corruptive influece of our courts becoming a commerical enterprise.
 
Senator John Cornyn of Texas battled about the LoPucki book with Delaware Senator Biden.
 
    Senator Biden is, of course, conflicted, as Delaware gets a large part of their annual budget from other state corporations paying Delaware taxes.
 

    As Senator Cronyn’s motivation(s) are the pursuits of each State keeping its own revenue and all courts remaining free from temptation to “court”; it is readily apparent what logic should prevail in a “chaste” world.

            Senator Cornyn stated, in a diplomatic manner in an issue of the Legal Times  ( here ),

             “Of course, no one wants to believe that a federal judge would ever distort the law for any reason, let alone in order to improve the court’s docket”. 

            At the same time the Senator stated in the Legal Times, (June 6, 2005), article that the facts are what they are; as Senator Cornyn remarked;

            “After all, picking a judge isn’t far from picking the verdict. What’s more, if debtor’s get to pick the jurisdiction, then bankruptcy courts have a disturbing incentive to compete with each other for major bankruptcy cases, by tilting their rulings in favor of corporate debtors and their attorneys.”
 
 
 
The 3rd Circuit Court of appeals, remarked that there is organized, sophisticated, bad faith behavior by attorney's is detrimental to the integrity of the system. This is due to the organized element now known as "Bankrutpcy Rings"
 

            The 3rd Circuit addressed the issues of “bankruptcy rings”. In the matter of In re Arkansas Co., 798 F.2d 645 (3rd Cir. 08/13/1986), the Circuit remarked upon the fabric of the stabs to clean up errant efforts, after the fact, to circumvent the Code, by quoting the verity that Congress was well aware of the “reality” of how the system “truly” works. The Third Circuit tackled the issues of offensive applications by faulty § 327(a) and Rule 2014 affidavits as follows;

            “It is significant that Congress chose to place the requirement of court approval for the employment of an attorney, accountant, or other professional by the creditors committee directly in the Bankruptcy Code in 1978. 11 U.S.C. § 1103(a). The legislative history makes clear that the 1978 Code was designed to eliminate the abuses and detrimental practices that had been found to prevail. Among such practices was the cronyism of the "bankruptcy ring" and attorney control of bankruptcy cases.

 

            The 3rd Circuit also noted the Congressional awareness of the harsh reality of perpetual malfeasance by attorneys as the Circuit continued on Arkansas stating;

 

    In fact, the House Report noted that "in practice . . . the bankruptcy system operates more for the benefit of attorneys than for the benefit of creditors." H.R. No. 595, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 92, reprinted in 1978 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 5963, 6053”
 
----------------------------------------------
 
In these modern days of Perjury prosecutions of Martha, Bonds, etc for making a false statement to an officer,,,,, how much more heinous will the public find the proof, by an authority that attorney's are lying under oath and getting millions in fees (that they are not entitled to if they tell the truth) and the "police" the Dept of Justice, utilize their power to protect the perpetrators of false hood and deception?
 
There are more than 100 felony violations in the eToys case. The law firms of MNAT and TBF have confessed to filing more than 34 false affidavits and deceiving the court.
 
Where are the prosecutions?
 
Where are the investigations?
 
The Delaware Dept of Justice refuses to even mention the name of the MNAT law firm in any briefings, much less mention their bad faith acts.
 
This problem is not just eToys alone, as you can see by the following;
 
A Dept of Justice Trial Attorney for the US Trustee Program went before Congress and stated that Director Friedman and Director White have done little to promote the Integrity of the US Trustee Program  ( here )
 
Judge Judith Fitzgerald stated that Justice Dept silence aided fraud  ( here ) (you will need to pan down to the W R Grace Tersigni issues and case where Judge Fitzgerald is shocked when the US Trustee representative says he was instructed not to tell the court anything. ( the story is also here )
 
Another Judge reported to House Judiciary Committee that the US Trustee Program is not a "watchdog" , that it is a "pack of dogs" ( here ) Judge Cristol also remarked that it is not David v Goliath it is Goliath versus and ant.
 
A Judge in Michigan dealt with a case, like eToys, where all the previous judges and US Trustee refused to address Fraud on the Court issues.  All previous court decisions in Matrix refused to have a hearing on fraud and the Judge remarked " The Courts have the inherent authority, and indeed a duty, to address fraud on the court issues"  (case item attached as a file).
 
The Courts have also dealt with eToys where the case of In re Baron's used the eToys case to reopen a closed case due to Fraud on the Court. (Florida In re Baron's and Meryl Lanson here ) ( when at the site do the keyword search for eToys, the Court states it agrees with the eToys decision that fraud on the court merits an extended time review.
 
Both the Delaware Dept of Justice and the Delaware Court has stated, despite the confessions to filing 34 false affidavits, that no perjury was documented. In Delaware, supplying a false affidavit is no big deal. (please see judge Walrath's Opinion page 52  here )
 
The 11th Circuit dealt with an issue where a Trustee tried to state that a false affidavit was not perjury if given voluntarily, the Judge in that case said such logic was absurd, "Lying under oath is lying under oath"  ( here )
 
If you file bankruptcy and hide aunt Martha's gift of her great grandmothers ring you can go to jail for 4 or 5 years.
 
If you are an attorney, who becomes an Officer of the Court and steals a public entity to sell it to your regular clients,
you just pay a itsy bitsy fine and can even retaliate and punish the person who blew the whistle on you.
 
Throwing away the shareholders of a public company by planting your paid associate is just a perk a court appointed counsel can enjoy, especially when one of the law firms has a former partner who is the United States Attorney
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Timeline of events of DOJ Cover Up and failure to investigate

The entity eToys went public in 1999 for $8bn and then bankrupt March 2001.
To date, there are no reports of any SEC, FBI or Dept of Justice investigation into this classic "pump n dump" and the real question of where did the money go?
 
Compounding those questions is the speciousness of how the SEC and other investigative parties sat still when the Debtor eToys, represented by the Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel ("MNAT") law firm petitioned the Delaware Bankruptcy Court for the strange request to Destroy Books n Records.
 
Of the many parties that failed to object to this arcane request there is the Creditors, represented by the Traub Bonacquist & Fox ("TBF") law firm and the policing entity of the bankruptcy court, the Dept of Justice United States Trustee's.
 
As it was obvious to anyone, that the request was an effort to destroy evidence, onc can only speculate as to what the motivations were for the lack of response, however, armed with the Court's approve of the esoteric Order, the Senior Executives summarily abandoned the eToys estate providing a feast of plenty to the attorneys' who were left with a cookie jar, milk, the keys and no one to say no!
 
Initially an auction was scheduled to liquidate the entire estate of eToys for $5 million.  The Creditors were alarmed about such a paltry result and sought the counsel of someone who could effect a better result. They settled upon Laser Steven Haas who had just received a significant result in another liquidation of 50% of value.
 
The attorneys TBF & MNAT negotiated that Haas would not be hired as a Professional Person, rather, Haas would utilize his company CLI and the attorney's would then also discouraged Haas from obtaining his own counsel, that the estate would have to pay for. Under the guise that it would save the estate expense, MNAT & TBF would supply the paperwork for CLI to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court instead of Haas doing so himself.
 
Despite the fact that Haas was extensively successful in his efforts and assisted in building the cash deposits of eToys to nearly $50 million, the TBF and MNAT law firms persistently found fault with everything that Haas and his company accomplished. One of the biggest critics at the end of 2001, of Haas, was the new President and CEO of eToys, Mr. Barry Gold and his secretary of sorts, Ellen Gordon from Xroads LLC (the court approved Financial Consultant responsible for accounting for eToys cash deposits).
 
Haas had pulled Barry Gold aside, when he came on board in May 2001 and remarked to Barry Gold that he was concerned that the TBF law firm had hidden agenda's and that Xroads LLC, Ellen Gordon and Paul Traub may be hiding additional items from all interested parties.
 
Haas did not know at the time, that Paul Traub and Barry Gold had been partners for some time.
Mr. Haas had discovered that there were overseas cash deposits, in the millions, that was not reported to the Courts. (The very failure to declare a cash asset on the bankruptcy filing schedules is fraud and a felony violation). When Haas reported this issue to the Creditors and the Creditors attorney,  instead of being thanked for the discovery, TBF again harangued and berated the efforts.
 
Of the many greater returns that Haas and his company had achieved was the sale of the eToys.com name for $10 million.  Inexplicably, MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold renegotiated that sale down to a purported $3 million.
 
Haas's company's commission and success fee's was based upon the actual sale result of the assets to buyers. At the end of 2001, TBF, MNAT and Barry Gold refused to permit Haas review of Books n Records so that a final fee application could be submitted. When it was time to file the final fee applications for CLI and Haas to the Court, MNAT simply refused to do so.
 
Being abandoned but having Court approval for the work, Haas hired another law firm. Haas received one more minor payment with the promise to settle on the balance. However, Haas had a problem, the CLI contracts stated that Haas must file a final fee application by March 2002. As Haas new counsel, Morris James, refused to address the readily apparent conflict of interest issues, Haas got on a plane and went to Delaware and hired a new attorney Henry Heiman. Heiman reported that he was a former Trustee and that the Court approved contracts were irrefutable.  Heiman stated that he would go to court, when the time was right and force compliance with the Court approved contracts.
 
Haas informed the Dept of Justice United States Trustee's office of the many issues at hand, specifically the Dept of Justice trial attorney handling the case, Mark Kenney. The responses from Mr. Kenney were obtuse to the issues at hand as Mr. Kenney reflected that no crimes had occurred and there was no reason to investigate.
 
Then, in a bizarre turn of events, Haas discovered that Barry Gold and TBF were actually associated from as far back as the 1980's, learning this from a former associate of Paul Traub's as the TBF law firm was previously known as Traub Bonacquist & Yellen, before becoming Traub Bonacquist & Fox.  Informing Henry Heiman of this fact resulted in intimidation and extortion acts by the TBF law firm that Henry Heiman actually emailed to Haas.
 
Heiman emailed to Haas that Susan Balaschak of TBF stated that if Haas did not "back off" not only would Haas and his company CLI not get paid, his career would suffer and other retaliations would occur.  Heiman then informed Haas that he should seek other counsel.
 
Haas found other counsels willing to take the case, but Henry Heiman refused to give that new counsel the files of Haas or CLI as Heiman abandoned his duties.
 
Forced to find a way to handle the issues, Haas began to study the Law and Dept of Justice US Trustee website.  At that time Haas learned that the Dept of Justice attorney, Mark Kenney and Henry Heiman had been taking advantage of the fact that Haas was a layman, where they stated no violations of the law had occurred, they were both, in fact, thwarting justice and giving Haas false information.
 
Laser Haas called Mark Kenney and told him of the email threat that was sent to him and how it violated the law. Acting with a little fit of rage, Mark Kenney stated that there was no laws broken and that the issue of Barry Gold and Traub had been handled in the "Bonus Sales" case.  This was the 2nd time the Bonus issued had been mentioned to Haas, however, it was the first time it was mentioned completely by Mark Kenney.
 
Armed with new knowledge of the Law, specifically Sections 101(14) and 327(a), along with the fact that they must be accompanied with a Rule 2014 affidavit, that affirms, "under penalty of perjury" that there are no undisclosed conflicts of interest, Haas looked up the Bonus Sales case on-line with PACER, the Public Access system to Court dockets.
 
As it turns out, Mark Kenney made a "lapse lingue" where such slip of the tongue provided Haas with the first, concrete proof positive, that the Law had been broken and that Perjury in the eToys case was profuse. As a hidden gem within the Bonus Sales bankruptcy case (DE Bankr 03-12284) an affidavit by a company entitled Asset Disposition Advisors LLC ("ADA") existed. On the first sheet of the ADA paperwork on the left side it states Barry Gold Principal and on the right side it states Paul Traub Principal.
 
Haas could not believe his eyes, there it was, concrete proof, irrefutable, as a court docket record, signed by Paul Traub himself, providing proof, beyond all reasonable doubt, that Paul Traub and Barry Gold had an "undisclosed" connection.
 
Further research of the ADA company led to the discovery that it was formed in April 2001. By all testimony before the court and a Hiring Letter not revealed until four (4) years later, Barry Gold became the "wind down coordinator" of eToys in May 2001 and then, after the initial success of the plot, Barry Gold was promoted to the President and CEO of eToys.
 
Both Haas and the eToys shareholders petitioned for an Emergency Hearing to deal with the malicious acts. The Emergency hearing occurred Dec. 22, 2004.  At the same time, with a press release also dated Dec 22 2004, the US Trustee program announced that the new Region 3 Trustee (who presides over Delaware) was Kelly B Stapleton who replaced the Acting US Trustee Roberta DeAngelis.
 
The Bankruptcy Code is designed by Congress to make sure that these type of shenanigans do not occur. That is why, even though attorneys already are governed by Model Rules of Conduct and their oath's before the State Bar's, Congress wanted to make sure that the Creditors and Debtor in bankruptcy cases were "arms length" in all their transactions, in order to assure good faith dealings. This is why Section 327(a), the application of Professional Persons requires that even an attorney must supply a Rule 2014 Affidavit affirming that they are "disinterested" parties as is defined by Section 101(14).
 
Therefore the only way that there can be any "undisclosed" issues of a "conflict of interest" is for an attorney to supply a False Affidavit.
 
Supplying a False Affidavits is an act of Perjury.
 
Doing so intentionally, after being warned not to do an act is extensively egregious.
 
This particular case is made morose because the United States Trustee's office testified, in its Motion to Disgorge the TBF law firm $1.6 million, that the parties had discussions with the US Trustee about replacing key personnel of the Debtor.  The US Trustee states twice in the Disgorge Motion that he instructed the parties Not to replace key personnel of the Debtor with anyone connected to the retained professionals of the estate.
 
Disregarding that authoritative warning, TBF, MNAT and Barry Gold, along with others, drafted the Hiring Letter for Barry Gold. He was given a contractual choice that permitted him to choose, whether or not, to apply to the Court for permission to be hired. This violates the law under pretense and "color of law". After choosing not to apply; Barry Gold was then given $40,000 per month, promoted to President/ CEO and promised a Bonus possibility at the end of the case.
 
Armed with these facts, alarmed that TBF was given immunity, Haas wondered what else was there that was hidden.
 
 Haas and the eToys shareholders looked everywhere for additional acts of malfeasance. Haas then discovered that MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold all had "undisclosed" connections to Bain/ KB. The significance of that is the fact that eToys sold the bulk of the estate assets to Bain/ KB for discounts in the tens of millions of dollars, including the nefarious renegotiation by the parties to reduce the $10 million dollar bid for eToys.com to only $3 million. 
 
This is Collusion to Defraud an estate. As entrusted Officers of the Court, there is no greater crime that the attorneys can commit.
 
The parties were so brazen and flagrantly arrogant in their acts of mendacity, believing that they had gotten away with all the subterfuge - MNAT is actually representing Bain in the KB bankruptcy case.
 
Paul Traub had the unmitigated gall to petition that Court for permission to prosecute the $100 million dollar cash payment that KB paid to Bain and Michael Glazer prior to KB filing for Bankruptcy.
 
 Haas then filed a motion to that Court. Upon reporting this to the Director of the United States Trustee and the Asst US Trustee who Motioned to Disgorge TBF the $1.6 million, both parties resigned.
 
Speciously and quietly (as you will find no press release in 2005 concerning the issue) the removed Roberta DeAngelis was promoted to the post of General Counsel of the US Trustee's office in Washington DC (EOUST GC).
 
Again, Mark Kenney stepped up to the plate and defended the perpetrators of fraud. Being that MNAT and TBF could not answer the Haas allegations and the Chairman of the Creditors Committee affidavits, the Delaware Dept of Justice submitted a Motion to the KB Court asking that Court to strike and expunge the Haas motion with proofs of perjury and fraud.
 
Seeing that it was readily apparent that the "fix" was in, Haas reached out to other governemant agencies such as the SEC, FBI, Public Integrity Section, the OSC, OGE, OIG, Pres Bush Corp Fraud Task Force, the OPR, Administrator of the Courts and even the US Marshall, all of whom referred Haas to the whistle blower entity, the local US Attorney and the General Counsel of the US Trustee's.
 
As anyone can see, though no one knew such at the time, sending any items to the General Counsel's office is a waste of energy, as you would be asking Roberta DeAngelis to prosecute her own failure to perform.
 
It has also been discovered that the US Attorney in Delaware, Colm F Connolly, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, the very year the fraud and perjury began (for all we know Connolly worked on the case or with the related clients). 
 
Colm Connolly's failure to investigate or prosecute violates Ethics, Model Rules of Conduct and the protocol of the Dept of Justice that requires him to notify the Public Integrity Section.
 
Therefore we decided to report the case to the CA US Attorney's office where Pres Bush Corp Fraud Task Force was managed and eToys has its' home office in CA.
 
We received no response from the CA US Attorney, whose website states that they will answer in 8 to 12 weeks with an acknowledgement that they are looking into the issue or a decline to go any furhter.
 
However, the Los Angeles Times reported a story that seems to be connected.  The official complaint was filed with the CA US Attorney Dec 7, 2007.  A little over the 12 weeks later, the CA US Attorney walked into a staff meeting and harangued his staff. After berating them he informed them that all personnel working in the Public Corruption Unit would be reassigned.
 
Making the actions appear even more specious is the fact that the L A Times reported a story on March 20, 2008;  that Tom O'Brien, the CA US Attorney went so far as to intimidate career prosecutors threatening to tarnish their reputations if they discussed any reason for the dismantling of the Public Corruption Unit with the Press.
 
Then, a few weeks later, May 2, 2008 the United States Trustee press releases made a note that Kelly B Stapleton, the girl that replaced Roberta DeAngelis, resigned.
 
Speciously and almost expectedly, the very person sent back into the Region 3 Trustee's office to clean up her own mess is the now notorious Roberta DeAngelis.
 
Then, just four days later, the WSJ reported on the fact that the FBI raided the home in Northern Virgina and his office, confiscating computers and files of Scott Bloch in Washington DC.
 
Scott Bloch was the head of the Office of Special Counsel in Washington DC.  Of the many duties the Office of Special Counsel is responsible for, the one germane here is the fact that the OSC's office handles sensitive investigations into Government wrongdoing. This would include Whistle Blower files against government personnel.
 
Things are certainly heating up and the amount of disparaging acts by the current Administrations Dept of Justice seems to know no restraint.
 
Many subpoenas were recently issued by Congress into the political prosecutions that apparently occurred and the firing of those that refused to prosecute such cases.
 
Wonder when the mindset of all will turn on the light bulb about the issue that if they can make prosecutions happen for political purposes, then the next obvious question is what prosecutions, that should have occurred, were buried?
 
We have one such case right here!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Law firms confessed to 34 acts of Perjury and Fraud on the Court

A Law Professor who wrote a book on Corruption stated
:"the system is too far gone"
 
Can it really be true, that No One Cares how much corruption goes on in our Federal Courts.
 
Is the need to appear kosher and clean so important that the System can fall into the realm of the arcane, for cronyism and anarchy's sake?  Just for the sake of appearances?
 
eToys went IPO in 1999 for $8bn and was Bankrupt March 2001.
 
How is it that the SEC, Dept of Justice US Trustee's and Court permitted Destruction of Books n Records early on in the case? (eToys docket item 300).
 
Where was the SEC, FBI and Dept of Justice investigations into the "pump n dump"?
 
It simply boggles the mind.
Confessions to 34 false affidavits and deceiving the Court.
The US Attorney who refuses to prosecute the case was a partner with one of the law firms that confessed.
 
Lying under Oath is Perjury.
Deliberately lying under Oath to hide the "planting" of a paid associate of Creditors within the Debtor as CEO is Collusion to Defraud an estate.
 
When the acts are done by a collaboration between both Debtor and Creditor's counsel, who both have relationships to Bain,
Where both MNAT and TBF represented their clients (eToys & creditors of eToys) and sold those clients assets to Bain for discounts in the tens of millions, doing so by supplying 34 false affidavits and the Planted person being CEO, the ONLY authority in the bankruptcy estate.
 
There can be no crime more heinous.
Except,
that the Dept of Justice, who swear an Oath to protect and defend the Laws and Constitution from enemies Foriegn and DOMESTIC,
violates that Oath of Office and speciously refuses to even mention the MNAT name or acts of mendacity, while they give Illegal, implied, immunity to the TBF law firm.
 
The fact that MNAT works for Goldman Sachs in DE and TBF/ Barry Gold worked for Goldman Sachs entity Cosmetics Plus, while there is a $500 to $800 million case in the NY Supreme Court of eToys against Goldman Sachs,
where TBF gained its permission to handle the case by a False Supplemental Affidavit to the Court, while TBF was of a Revoked status by the State of NY and where TBF is now closed and the TBF co-counsel in the NY Supreme Court case (601805/2002) assisted with the Barry Gold D&O Insurance.
Violating Model Rule's everywhere.
 
Why does no one seem to care?????????
 
 
The DE DOJ refuses to mention the MNAT law firms name, as the DE US Attorney was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, when $300 million in fraud and 34 acts of perjury began.
When we reported to the CA US Attorney, the discovery that Colm Connolly, the DE US Attorney who refused to prosecute or investigate the case, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001 the only reply was the immediate dismantling of the Public Corruption Unit and threats against career Asst US Attorney's to keep their mouths shut.
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/20/local/me-shakeup20
 
It is a fact, that you can go to the Dept of Justice Information on Resume of US Attorney, Colm F Connolly shows that Connolly was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001.
 
The TBF and MNAT law firm have confessed to supplying 34 false Rule 2014/ 2016 affidavits to the Federal Court in eToys DE Bankr 01-706 and deliberately deceiving the Court about the false affidavits.
 
TBF and MNAT collaborated to "PLANT" a paid associate of TBF (Mr. Barry Gold) within eToys as Pres/ CEO and then Confirmed Plan Administrator.
 
The US Trustee progam replaced the Region 3 Trustee, Roberta DeAngelis wiht a press release Dec 22, 2004
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/stapleton_release2_12-04.htm
 
The Emergency hearing to address the Fraud and Perjury issues in the eToys case occurred, coincidently Dec 22, 2004.
 
The Court Ordered the law firms to reply to the allegations. Being "caught" by Court docket records, the parties confessed to filing the false affidavits and offered cheeky excuses of inadvertent neglect (Response Jan 25, 2005)
 
The Court held a hearing Feb 1, 2005 and after hearing enough proof, permitted the pro se shareholders and Haas permission to Depose the TBF and MNAT law firms as well as Barry Gold on Feb 9 2005.
 
After the Depositions uncovered additional confessions, the US Trustee Motion to Disgorge the TBF law firm for $1.6 million Feb 15, 2005 and speciously did not mention the MNAT law firms acts.
 
Less than ten (10) days later, the DE Dept of Justice Trial Attorney issued a Stipulation to Settle the $1.6 million for only $750,000 and gave the TBF law firm ILLEGAL, implied, blanket, immunity and Unlawful permission to violate the Laws the DE Dept of Justice US Trustee's are supposed to defend from violations.
 
Then, armed with the impunity, the MNAT and TBF law firms committed another $100 million fraud in the KB Toys case (04-10120) and when we reported it, alarmingly, the DE Dept of Justice came to their rescue and Obstructed Justice by asking that Court to strike and expunge Haas's briefings (KB case docket item 2228)
 
Then the Director of the Exec Office of United States Trustee's (EOUST) in Washington DC, Mr. Lawrence Friedman - Resigned
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/friedman_resignation_4-27-05.htm
 
The $3 million dollar claim Haas and his company had in eToys was then transferred to another Judge who warned Haas to back off from filing anything else. Haas disobeyed the threat to stop investigating and the WSJ Reported on the $750,000 sanction that was offered the TBF law firm, even though the Judge had not ruled on it yet.
www.wjfa.net/bk/etoys.html
 
Haas sent proof of the perjury, fraud and scheme to cover up the affair everywhere, the OIG, OGE, FBI, Public Integrity Section, ORO, US Marshalls, Pres Bush Corp Fraud Task Force, the OSC, etc etc.,
 
As a protocol, everyone referred the matter to the local US Attorney (including Debra Yang of Pres Bush Corp Fraud Task Force) and the other protocol, as a Judge cannot remove a US Trustee, is to refer the matter to the Dept of Justice EOUST General Counsel.
 
The problem here being that those two parties is Colm F Connolly, the former Partner with the MNAT law firm and the General Counsel somehow, speciously and with NO Press Release of the issues, became Roberta DeAngelis, the former Removed US Trustee by Lawrence Friedman.
 
So the referals were going to the very persons who had a reason to Cover up the case, who also had Undisclosed, conflicts of interest issues.
 
After the alarming issue of the dismantling of the Public Corruption Unit by CA US Attorney Tom O'Brien, the FBI called Haas.
Haas spoke with agents in CA, Washington DC and Balt Md (Balt oversees DE)
 
Then, Kelly B Stapleton resigned as Region 3 Trustee over DE and Roberta DeAngelis, as dumb as it may seem, returned to Phil/ Delaware as the new Acting US Trustee where the Dept of Justice finally made notice of the DeAngelis issue as the General Counsel
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/2008/pr20080502.htm

Then, one week later, the FBI raided the OSC's home and office
FOR
the destruction of Whistle Blower files against Government personnel.
 
 
Now, R U ready for the Big Finale?
The MNAT and TBF law firm, as well as Barry Gold supplied their false affidavits in eToys and the KB Toys case, that accomplished $300 million in fraud that greatly benefited BAIN.
Who handled BAIN and still owns thereof in 2001.
MR MITT ROMNEY!

Yes, it is "our" case and who cares about a Dot Com company gone bust?

Wait, they are not bust, you can still go to www.etoys.com and buy goods as it is a NASDQ stock (symbol KIDS)

How did the company that was broke, still wind up on an Exchange?

Maybe we should ask Bain's buddy company D E Shaw.

Scott Henkin, the bondholder manager of Fir Tree Value Fund,
who told Haas he O K'd the dealings that TBF could plant Barry Gold within eToys
well Scott Henkin was rewarded also.

For he is Exec at D E Shaw that owns the Parent Company, that owns eToys on NASDQ as stock symbol KIDS.

Tangled web to deceive doing so many crimes no one could ever believe.

For there is No Punishment, No investigation
on destruction of the
Whistle Blower
Laser Haas.

After all, who cares how corrupt Delaware Courts and the DE Dept of Justice rogue personnel are?

Does Kmart care?
Does Stage Stores care?
Does KB care?
Does Goldman Sachs care?

Do You Care?